All Your Memes Are In Our Base - Forever Alone, Rage Guy, Philosoraptor, Troll Face, and friends

 

« Previous | Next »


Philosoraptor: Vegetarians

memes - If vegetarians love animals so much,  Why do they eat all their food?

LoL by:

read26

Picture by: Unknown

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» Read 164 Trolls (and some comments)

  1. hardcore vegetarian says:

    Its an alternative way for showing them whos boss

  2. razial says:

    Vegetarians eat animal food instead of eating animals to make up for not killing animal , they are indirectly killing animals so that it makes them look innocent thus not being blamed for animal deaths all around the world

    • Alejandro says:

      Um…I hope you know that all you need to plant a fruit or vegetable is one seed right? So if I plant e.g ONE potato, all I would technically be eating afterwards (planting over and over again) is that one potato…Now apply it to all over the world. Although I’m a vegetarian only in the US because of how cruelly its made. When I go to Colombia, I eat meat. It was on the news (can’t find the video or I would’ve very gladly posted it) that the happiest farm animals live in Colombia.

      P.S I’m not a PETA person (although I agree with some of what they say…they are a bit too extremist…ban fishing??? That’s nice and all but…let’s be real…)

      • razial36 says:

        Potatoes grow from spuds… ( They have no seeds )
        You should have said strawberries , strawberries have lots of seeds !

        • ben says:

          Reposting this as it’s awaiting moderation while my other posts aren’t. I’m fairly certain the animal doesn’t want to die, regardless of the quality of life it had. If anything, by your logic it would be more humane to eat animals that were housed in poor conditions because it ended the inhumane treatment they were subjected to, while the happy C0l0mbian animals were happily frolicking along in Rainbow-Honeydew Meadow before being slaught3red. (the numbers in place of letters are to try and stop the need for arbitrary moderation)

        • HMman says:

          Potatoes have seeds…
          They are grown from the spuds as then you get the same plant; if you plant the seeds, you get different, random, and potentially not as good potatoes. The potato plants grow what look like little green tomatoes; inside are the seeds.

        • Alejandro says:

          I didn’t know what those were called in English…so now i’ll remember! Spuds! Thanks!

      • chuchurocket says:

        you know that all you need to have a ranch full of cows, pigs and chickens are just TWO of each of those animals right?? and just 1 single offspring from those initial 2 animals will provide enough food for a group of people, or multiple full meals worth of food for an individual. from just those 2 initial parents the amount and size of the offspring will eventually grow so large it will feed a village of people. try to apply the same rule with your seed and see how many days you will last.

        • Dr_Maricon says:

          Well i’m a big meat eater, but your argument is kinda moronic….

          Do you expect animals to feed on their own fart?

      • ben says:

        I’m fairly certain the animal doesn’t want to die, regardless of the quality of life it had. If anything, by your logic it would be more humane to eat animals that were housed in poor conditions because it ended the inhumane treatment they were subjected to, while the happy Colombian animals were happily frolicking along in Rainbow-Honeydew Meadow before being slaughtered.

      • Praetorgredior says:

        Farm animals in columbia are the “high”-est animals in the world at least.

      • lilly says:

        And how exactly is it made cruelly? That’s stupid.

  3. Gilbert says:

    I don’t think so…

  4. tonk says:

    I’m not vegetarian because I love animals…I’m vegetarian because I hate plants

  5. Carlos says:

    ohh crap, they will start their photosynthesis….

  6. DaCookieLord says:

    PREPARE YOURSELVES FOR THE IMMINENT POST AVALANCHE

  7. naana says:

    They help against animal obesity.

    YO FAT DAWG

  8. Perseus says:

    Ohohoho. As a vegetarian, I say to you, Philosoraptor…well played. Well played indeed.

  9. FUUUU says:

    Some animals eat other animals…

  10. horrosho says:

    The insane amount of hipsters and vegetarians I see eating bamboo makes me rage

    • PUDDI says:

      Shove it up their fingernails. Problem solved.

    • gelatin skeleton says:

      So they’re not even doing anything that affects you, they’re just eating.

      How dare they!

      OH NOES someone iz eatin the bamboos in my general vicinity!!! My fragile world is falling apart!!!111111one

      Get over yourself, it’s not about you all the time. Maybe you wouldn’t have these rage problems if you concerned yourself over your own life.

      PROTIP: Step 1, get a life, then concern yourself with it.

  11. Duke244 says:

    We should raise plants which eat Animal eating Animals
    Problem Nature?

  12. PUDDI says:

    In reality, vegetarians are taking lives when they eat. Plants have lives.
    Real people:1
    Vegetarians:0

    • HarrietRants says:

      Vegetarians aren’t real people? Wow, I didn’t realise I was virtual.

    • neoritter says:

      Plants may also feel pain. There’s recent research that shows that plants may have a nervous system. Different than what we’d consider a nervous system, but one none the less.

      • andrew says:

        mythbusters proved it. they dont feel a thing :P

        • chuchurocket says:

          you mean the episode where they tried to imagine hurting the tree? they did detect many responses from the tree, they just couldn’t prove that it was caused by their actions. a plant definitely knows when it is physically damaged, whether you call that level of consciousness as “pain” or not is up to you, but i know for a fact that even if i’m paralyzed from the neck down and couldn’t feel anything, i’d still be pretty pissed if i learned that someone is trying to harvest my toes for food.

          • neoritter says:

            What I’m about to say is not related to what I originally said. But, if you look at pain in a “philosophical” sense. Pain is just the negative reaction to stimulus. Plants react to stimulus, if they didn’t they wouldn’t be living organisms. It’s an assumed fact that poisons in plants, etc are defense mechanisms against predators. That would imply a negative reaction to stimulus or in otherwords pain.

            Assuming my logic is good. Plants feel pain. Just not the way we or other animals might.

        • ben says:

          Mythbusters is hardly definitive, they “proved” that women have a higher tolerance to pain through testing how long they could keep their hands in iced water. Women naturally have a higher percentage of body fat on average (look it up), and as such would be able to resist the cold moreso (like seals use blubber). The entrants also weren’t told that the test was to discover which gender had a higher tolerance to “pain” (cold resistance), as the male ego would probably come into action which would result in men holding out longer. They also “proved” that redheads had a higher resistance to cold, after informing the redheads that the test was to see whether they could hold out the cold longer (giving them something to prove, which would naturally make you desire holding out longer) and failing to inform the non redheads of such an aim in the test. Here’s a study which gauges resistance to pressure on the Achilles tendon which many would consider closer to a pain test than the test from Mythbusters which shows men have a far higher resistance to pressure upon the Achilles tendon than women. {http://www.unethical-studies.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/2010-06-29-Woodrow-548.pdf}

          • ... says:

            While you have a point with the redhead test, the men vs women test wasn’t about male macho. It was about pain tolerance, and none of the participants were supposed to know it was men vs women. Granted, the redhead test was also supposed to be about pain tolerance, and I’ll have to rewatch that episode to see if there was any stated reason as to why the redheads were told, but still…

            Also, the cold was chosen simply because it was considered the best of the four test options they explored.

            • ben says:

              Cold resistance doesn’t equate to what most would consider pain tolerance. Average women, having a naturally higher percentage of body fat, wouldn’t feel cold temperatures at the same severity as the average male. That’s why I posted that link; the study features a test that many more would associate to be “classical” pain resistance, rather than cold resistance.

              • ... says:

                That doesn’t seem at all true where I live… Women here seem to be the first to complain (LOUDLY) that they’re cold.

        • naisa says:

          But L. Ron Hubbard proved that tomatoes scream when sliced

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-meter

          L. Ron Hubbard = Science. And if you don’t believe me, ask Tom Cruise.

      • ben says:

        Eating the fallen fruits wouldn’t be able to hurt the plant.

        • benj says:

          Just eating the fallen fruits is a difficult way to sustain yourself in modern society. Maybe if you retreat to deep untouched forests and meditate all day.

        • neoritter says:

          Fruits alone can not sustain a person. At some point you’ll need to pick up at least a vegetable. What’s more the fruit is purposefully designed to entice animals to eat it. Since fruit contains seeds, the animal eating it is being used to plant the next generation.

      • Stephen says:

        They would need a consciousness to feel pain, and unless I’m mistaken plants aren’t very well known for having such a highly developed nervous system for that to be possible. With extremely limited and generally slow movement there would be no way for pain to evolve anyway, something which can’t do much about danger doesn’t need a warning system for it.
        The closest things plants could even possibly get to pain would be a slight mechanical reaction to somehow avoid or slightly lessen danger. In other words, they don’t feel pain. That’s ridiculous.

        • ben says:

          Er, what mechanical (if you mean reactionary, not inherent things like thorns) reactions do plants show to avoid danger? Aside from the Mexican Fighting Tree, that is.

        • neoritter says:

          Now you’re just arguing out of your means here.

          Consciousness –
          the state of being conscious; awareness of one’s own existence, sensations, thoughts, surroundings, etc.

          There’s just so much wrong with assuming that plants are not aware of their existance versus animals. Particularly when the qualifications for “consciousness” are so vague and debatable.

          But to argue a point here. Venus fly traps are aware of their surroundings. They can differentiate between a fly and leaf failing into their traps. If they can postively react to stimulus, it stands to reason they negatively react to it.

      • Bad Moon says:

        So are you expecting those who are veggie to starve? :|

  13. Tom Rowe says:

    This is originally from Sickipedia, you thief.

    • Bad Moon says:

      How is passing on a joke “stealing”? If you hear a good joke and pass it on, do you get called a thief for doing so? Get a grip you idiot.

  14. Derp says:

    Needs moar ham.

  15. Asha says:

    Well, I’m pretty sure farmers save their A plants for human consumption and give the B plants to their livestock. Egg farmers give their pretty, perfect eggs to grocery stores and use their smaller, uglier eggs in baked goods and the like. So in essence, the livestock are helping the world by eliminating wasted food. Because THEY CARE ABOUT THOSE STARVING PYGMIES IN AFFURKA. Yeah. That sounds okay.

  16. Jake says:

    @Philosiraptor: As Asha says, Animals are given different food than people. In addition, large amounts of plants are grown to produce small amounts of slightly edible dead animal flesh, or ‘meat’, as you call it. Since more plant matter is eaten by farm animals than humans, Philosiraptor, Raziel, Puddi, and Tonk, you can actually SAVE PLANTS by going vegetarian.

    @Puddi, Neoritter: an organism cannot feel pain without a brain to render it.

    Also, since so much food is wasted on growing animals for ‘meat’, Phlosiraptor could ask a similar question of you: “If you care about your fellow man, why do feed so much of his food to your animals, which you then kill to make much less food?” You ARE starving Ethiopians.

    • slartibartfast says:

      i am NOT a starving ethiopian!

    • ... says:

      As far as we know. So, if an organism cannot have a sense of touch without a brain (a logical extension of your arguement), how does a venus flytrap know when its caught food? How does a sunflower know which direction the sun is in? How do creepers know where the wall is? How do parasitic vines know when there’s a tree to climb and suck the life from/block from the sun?

      • alextreme says:

        A Venus flytrap has special sensory hairs.
        A sunflower moves by Heliotropism (rather complicated look it up youself).
        Creepers use gravity.
        Parasitic vines just drop by chance.

    • Katy, Lord of Squid says:

      Bacon still tastes WAY better.

    • wait says:

      youre saying that if 6 billion people start eating plants then we wont upset the balance of nature? and that more vegetables would be saved?

      • benj says:

        Absolutely. They majority are eating plants or their seeds (grains) already anyway. You obviousy have no idea how much resources are involved in raising livestock. I’ll give you a clue: much less than all the plant feed/grains that are being produced purely for consumption by livestock.

      • Jake says:

        Yes, you upset the balance of nature first by breeding millions of cows, pigs, & chickens and feeding them hundreds of millions of crops, just so everyone in a first-world country can eat meat whenever they want rather than hunt animals like REAL NONVEGETARIANS. And even if they all hunted, cows and pigs would go extinct if everyone wanted them as bad as many of you.

        I take it you just skipped over “Since more plant matter is eaten by farm animals than humans” didn’t you?

    • troll says:

      if this is a question of efficiency….then stop using a computer… the energy can be better used elsewhere

      …..u jelly bro?

      ps meat tastes good

      • Jake says:

        I love how everyone and their mother uses something like that as an argument at some time. Pobody’s sherfect, nithead.

  17. yayay says:

    Leaving out the argument of animal cruelty/etc., an advantage to being a vegetarian is the fact that eating plants provides more nutrition than eating an animal. The farther up the food chain you go, the less energy there is. (Approximately 10% of energy passes through each level.) So, if you ate a plant – a producer, at the bottom of every food chain – you are getting more energy than you would eating a cow.

    TL;DR: YOU’RE FAT.

    • Pie says:

      If you eat fat, you get more energy.

      Cows eat thousands of plants, so your argument is invalid.

      • gelatin skeleton says:

        They why aren’t fat people full of energy? Most of them can hardly escape a sofa.

        • jc says:

          They’re full of stored energy, but it’s extremely heavy and they have to carry it around with them wherever they go.

        • me says:

          People who eat meat aren’t fat, people who eat greasy crap are. And veggie food can be just as bad..just trow it in a deep-fryer.

    • hazza says:

      Nope. l2 Amino acids/proteins.

    • Tina says:

      Just letting you know you incorrectly interpreted the idea of trophic levels.

      Trophic levels indicate the EFFICIENCY OF ENERGY CONVERSION FROM SOLAR ENERGY. In other words, of the energy available at the herbivore level, only 10% of it is USED by the next rung. This is indicative of a INEFFICIENCY in conversion. The correct point in using this trophic diagram is that, for example, eating 1 pound of tuna meat, for example, is the same as eating 10 pounds of sardines… so there was 90% waste in making that one pound of tuna meat.

      This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the “energy you get” from eating an animal. The energy you get is dependent on the material you are eating (protein, carbs, etc). The structure is generally the same from organism to organism (protein, carbs, etc.) and the structure of the molecule tells you how difficult/easy it is to break apart (how much energy you can efficiently harvest from it). This is why some people believe Atkins is good way to lose weight, because protein is not the most efficient storage molecule (fat is)… it is the hardest to break down. More energy input is required to harvest the same amount of energy in protein v. fat.

      –This is why I wish a college-level science education was mandatory for everyone.

    • Corbin says:

      this statement is true but what you are forgetting is that since only 10% travels up a level animals eats more to compensate so the energy movement has nothing to do with how much energy is in the plant or animal its how much that plant or animals eats (For example a cow doesn’t have only 10% the energy of grass.) But I am sure once you finish middle school you’ll know this

  18. kim says:

    im vegetarian, and its nothing to do with a love of animals. this meme isnt funny cause it makes no sense to me.

  19. Putah says:

    LOLOLOLOLOL RIGHT!!!

  20. Ryan Waxx says:

    Vegetarians eat plants because they are abject cowards and are terrified at the prospect of eating something that could theoretically fight back or run away.

    • strawberrie says:

      You buy it from a super market. What’s it gonna do? I mean they’ve already been overfed, raised in their own filth, tazed into cages, beheaded or boiled alive, and cut up. I’m pretty sure we’re safe. Theoretically yeah but it’s “farmers” who work with them and deliver, not the consumer.

      • The_Knights_Who_Say_Ni says:

        Thats why real men eat their food raw and fresh from the kill. Mmmmmmmmmm…

      • ... says:

        Boiled alive? Where are you getting your info? Any food that’s precooked where I go to buy food was cut up for cooking long before being cooked, and I’ve never seen any preboiled meat in any of the stores I’ve ever been in, and that includes stores in a couple countries besides the US, as well as stores in about 6 or 7 states.

        • gelatin skeleton says:

          Spam is pre-boiled, as is almost any meat that comes in a tin or can.

          Though “boiled alive” is not accurate.

          • H says:

            Spam does not count as meat. That stuff’s nasty :/

          • Jake says:

            Some chickens fall into scalding-hot feather removal tanks and are boiled alive accidentally. This is what Strawberrie is referring to.

            However, just because it’s an accident doesn’t mean that anyone in the factory-farm cares, or that they’ll ever take steps to prevent it. Factory farm workers see animals as walking vegetables, and science has proven this belief false.

        • jacky says:

          How do you cook lobsters or crab, or some shelfish?

          I’m really far from being a vegetarian but I think vegetarians have a good point with overproduction: how many animals are killed and how many are eaten? there is a lot of waste whereas for vegetables, you can use it again as fertilizer.
          Overproduction is typically human.

    • benj says:

      You kill your meals before you eat them?

  21. Gardaakan says:

    I am vegetarian because of the life we force upon livestock and others. A lion kills its prey… but it has lived its life peacefully. A chicken…. does NOT live peacefully…

    I am a vegetarian, but I am for hunting… natural attitude of us hunting mammals.

    Nonetheless, funny caption, made me lol.

    Check out EPIC MEAL TIME for some non vegetarian loads of fun

  22. strawberrie says:

    Joke is overused. It’s been on freaking repeat on Dear Blank Please Blank and other websites of the such, now it has infiltrated Memebase D:

  23. Manly GaGa says:

    Yes but you always see lions eating the baby wildebeest who hasn’t lived it’s live yet.

  24. Bored d-bag says:

    Coz they’re animals, too. They just don’t even try to mask this fact. So they are in a fair food competition with another species. Who gets it first, eats it.

  25. Twinkles says:

    Vegitarians aren’t taking food off the animals, get back under your bridges trolls! If people stopped eating meat (which will never happen i know) the grain used to feed the animals used for consumtiption would feed 3rd world countries, the water used to let them drink is half of thats consumed in the whole of america. imagine the other countries and their animals too. And another thing if we werent breeding them at such a rate they wouldn’t be stripping the earth of prcious top soil that floats into the atmosphere and is irreplacable. It’s about sustainability. And frankly that was so stupid. Worst troll ever.. You are mere trollbail.

    • Asha says:

      So…you’re saying you have more right to life than those animals? That’s…very animal-friendly thinking there. “The world would be so much better if those animals didn’t exist at all!”

      • ben says:

        Limiting their breeding is hardly being cruel. There’s only such high numbers of meat animals because they’re being bred to be eaten.

      • benj says:

        “The world would be so much better if those animals didn’t exist at all!”

        I bet most animals bred in the modern bio-industrial conditions wish they didn’t exist at all, since their life is hell (boxed up in their own excrements).

        Plus, what ben says below…

    • troll says:

      …..bro, animals taste good…… go gibbon a cow

      .. u jelly?

    • Stephen says:

      You’ve just responded to it with pseudo-science in an overly upset tone. Doesn’t seem like a bad troll to me.

      • Jake says:

        Everyone and their mother also uses the word ‘psudoscience’ at some point too. It’s the activist debate equivalent of yelling “HAX!!” in an FPS.

        • troll says:

          again with the mother comment bro

          ….u mad ass-wipe?

        • troll says:

          HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!! HAX!!!!!!11!!11!!1ONE!!!!

        • troll says:

          u mad?

    • H says:

      I think if you learned to spell and use proper grammar, people would be more likely to take you seriously.

      Just a thought.

  26. Meggers says:

    Not everyone is vegetarian because we “love” animals. I do it because it’s genuinely better for the environment, and it’s healthier (in some ways). I don’t like having to feel like I need a reason that’s up to other people’s standards. It’s a personal choice like any other.

    • Ye says:

      I fail to see how it’s “better for the environment”.

      Sounds like there was some flawed logic put into making that statement.

      • shinxyblog says:

        Yeah, because cattle farming totally doesn’t render the ground useless for the next couple of hundred years after, cows aren’t a major source of methane and eating and hunting certain animals into extinction or on the contrary overfarming them doesn’t cause an imbalance in the ecosystem at all. For starters.

        • troll says:

          sarcasm doesn’t work on the internet….

          sandwich please (with extra meat)

          u jelly?

          • Bad Moon says:

            Domestic cattle yield much less meat per acre of grazing than bison. That renders domestic cattle rearing unecomical and thus not as good for the environment. Bison meat is leaner, is more nutritious and is lower in cholesterol than domestic beef. If more people used native breeds of cattle instead of imported beef, then less land would yield more beef, and so less feed and water would need to be used. Thus that is why it’s not enviromentally sound.

      • ben says:

        Cows eat far more nutrition (to power their metabolism, functions) than they provide through their meat whereas growing plants would be more efficient as not as many resources are involved. Resources are sourced from the environment and trees are cut down for grazing fields, so it would be more efficient and better for the environment to be vegetarian. Sounds like your logic is flawed, fool.

        • Stephen says:

          …but only if you kill all the cows first.

          Yeah, that’smuch more logical!

        • Ye says:

          That would be eating cattle.

          Me going out and shooting a deer with my bow and cutting it up to eat isn’t bad for the environment.

          Like i said, flawed logic. The industrialized way we prepare food for the supermarket is bad for the environment, not the act of eating the meat itself.

          • Ye says:

            Sorry responded to the wrong person, although you are still only talking about cattle.

            And bringing in ‘efficiency’ when food is involved is very silly. Food has almost NEVER been about efficiency, it’s been about eating things that taste good and provide nutrition.

            • benj says:

              “And bringing in ‘efficiency’ when food is involved is very silly. Food has almost NEVER been about efficiency, it’s been about eating things that taste good and provide nutrition.”

              Being entirely unconscious of the depletion of earth’s resources is a very good attitude for the attainment of your own destruction. Just keep consuming.

          • H says:

            If the only meat you eat is hunted and killed with a bow and arrow, then you’re right, but the majority of the population – in the developed world, anyway – is more likely to get their food at a grocery store. I know I’m personally too much of a wimp to actually go and kill my food, and I don’t think that’s an uncommon stance.

        • ... says:

          So… You’re saying that farmers never cut down trees to make farmland for their crops?

  27. Asha says:

    It’s just funny to me how many pro-veg ideals are defeated by the idea of organic and/or kosher meat. But whatever.

    • shinxyblog says:

      Most of us are against the idea of farming and killing animals for food (at least for humans), how on earth does organic and/or kosher meat defeat this?

    • Jake says:

      Just so everyone knows, “kosher meat” doesn’t just sound like an oxymoron, it’s a complete LIE. There’s videos of ‘kosher’ factory farms, they’re no better than normal ones.

  28. Appollo says:

    If a cow has four stomachs, digests food I can’t and weighs hundreds of pounds and doesn’t run away when you get close to it, then aren’t I obligated to eat it? If not, why is it so tasty?

  29. mata-ratos says:

    … Alas, what a remarkable bunch of morons is this one that dwells on this meme. :|

  30. Tecuani says:

    Vegetarians are not eating your “food’s” food, your “food” is eating is consuming the ressources of the brothers and sisters in your own species…
    Besides those “food/animals” are degenerated atrocities bred in some kind of concentration camp – guten apetit kameraden!

    • ... says:

      1) The food used to feed animals wouldn’t be offerred to third-world countries anyway. It simply wouldn’t be grown, because it’s not considered good enough for humans.

      2) In continuation of 1, cattle and other livestock are fed a lesser grade of food than that given to humans, as has already been said above.

      3) The modern versions of livestock were bred long before modern-day mass-production farms. There is evidence of selective breeding and domestication in some of the first permanent human settlements.

      4) Nazis did not refer to each other as ‘comrade’. That’s the Soviet Communists you’re thinking of, and ‘comrade’ came about due to the ideas of Soviet Communism. I don’t feel like explaining it here, so look it up yourself.

      5) Modern mass-production may not provide the best conditions in the world for livestock, but you should probably research concentration camps before you compare said farms to them.

  31. Thea Beulah says:

    This silly belief that vegetarians eat the food of animals is based on sole ignorance. The cattle that is nowadays raised only for its meat is fed with grain and soy, yes, but it is not their natural food. It is what we feed them in order for the animals to put on weight in a quick pace. But the animals that we breed and use for food has one natural food – grass. And grass also happens to be one of the few foods in this world humans cannot obtain any nutrition from.

  32. yasdag says:

    Am I the only one who notices that omnivores eat more animals’ food then herbavores?

  33. Mitchie says:

    Its a good thing we dont eat grass then!

  34. BellaMuerte92 says:

    I’m a vegetarian… And I don’t get it…

  35. llort says:

    Haha. Funny to see all the vagitarians get worked up whenever there is a joke about them.

  36. qwerrecd says:

    Uhh… It makes sense if you don’t think about it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up